# 4. The Mantle The mantle accounts for roughly 84% of Earth's volume and forms the thick, mostly solid layer between the crust and the core. Though solid, mantle rock deforms plastically over geological timescales, flowing at rates of centimeters per year. ## 4.1 Upper Mantle and the Asthenosphere The uppermost mantle, combined with the crust, forms the rigid lithosphere. Beneath it lies the asthenosphere, a weaker, partially ductile layer that allows the lithospheric plates to move relatively independently of the deeper mantle. ## 4.2 Lower Mantle and the Core–Mantle Boundary (CMB) The lower mantle is denser and more rigid than the upper mantle due to pressure, but still flows convectively over long timescales. At its base, roughly 2,890 km deep, it meets the liquid outer core at the core–mantle boundary — one of the most important interfaces in the entire Earth system, discussed in detail in Section 6. ## 4.3 Mantle Composition and Mineralogy: The Pyrolite Model and Phase Transitions The mantle is not a single mineral, and it does not stay the same mineral with depth — its composition is inferred from a combination of seismology, high-pressure experiments, and direct rock samples (Section 4.7), and it transforms through several distinct mineral phases as pressure increases. - **The pyrolite model:** the standard working composition for the upper mantle, called "pyrolite" (a portmanteau of peridotite and basalt), is dominated by the mineral olivine along with pyroxene and garnet — essentially the same rock type recovered directly as mantle xenoliths (Section 4.7) and inferred indirectly from the chemistry of basalts produced by mantle melting (Section 3.6). - **The 410 km discontinuity:** with increasing pressure, olivine transforms into a denser mineral structure called wadsleyite. This transformation happens over a narrow depth range and produces a sharp, seismically detectable jump in wave speed — one of the clearest and most well-established discontinuities in the mantle. - **The 520 km discontinuity:** a second, more subtle transition converts wadsleyite into ringwoodite, another densely packed mineral structure with the same overall chemistry — this discontinuity is real but less pronounced seismically than the ones on either side of it, and was only confidently resolved as a separate feature more recently than the 410 and 660 km boundaries. - **The 660 km discontinuity:** ringwoodite breaks down into a mixture of bridgmanite (the most abundant mineral in the entire Earth by volume, though it was only given that name in 2014 — previously called silicate perovskite) and ferropericlase. This transition is endothermic (it absorbs heat), which is part of why it acts as at least a partial barrier to convective flow (Section 11.3), unlike the exothermic 410 km transition, which tends to enhance flow crossing it. - **Below 660 km:** the lower mantle is dominated by bridgmanite and ferropericlase until very near the CMB, where extreme pressure drives a further transition of bridgmanite into an even denser phase called post-perovskite — a transition discovered only in 2004 and thought to be closely connected to the seismic anomalies and anisotropy of the D″ layer described in Sections 6.5 and 8.7. ## 4.4 Mantle Viscosity: How "Runny" Is Solid Rock? Mantle convection (Sections 4, 9.3) depends entirely on the mantle being able to flow at all, and quantifying exactly how easily it flows is its own substantial area of study. - **Typical values:** the upper mantle has an estimated viscosity on the order of 10²⁰–10²¹ Pa·s, while the lower mantle is generally estimated to be roughly one to two orders of magnitude more viscous, around 10²¹–10²² Pa·s — for comparison, both figures are still trillions of times more viscous than honey, which is why mantle flow is measured in centimeters per year rather than anything visible on human timescales. - **How it****'****s measured:** post-glacial rebound (Section 9.2) remains the most direct method — the rate at which formerly ice-loaded land rebounds today depends sensitively on how easily the mantle beneath it can flow to accommodate the redistributed weight, and matching the observed rebound rate to a flow model yields a viscosity estimate. - **The viscosity jump at 660 km is debated:** whether viscosity increases sharply, gradually, or barely at all across the 660 km phase transition (Section 4.3) is not fully settled, and different assumptions here materially affect whether models favor whole-mantle convection or a more layered picture (Section 11.3) — viscosity structure and convective structure are two sides of the same open question, not independent facts. - **Viscosity is temperature- and stress-dependent:** unlike a simple fluid, mantle rock's effective viscosity depends strongly on local temperature and on how fast it is being deformed, meaning "the" mantle viscosity is really a a strongly varying property rather than a single constant — hotter regions (such as near a plume, Section 6.2) flow far more easily than cooler regions of the same mineral composition. ## 4.5 Geochemical Heterogeneity: The Mantle's Different "Flavors" Despite convecting for billions of years, the mantle has not fully homogenized — different regions retain distinct chemical and isotopic signatures that reveal something about their history and origin. - **MORB vs. OIB:** basalt erupted at mid-ocean ridges (MORB, Section 3.6) is systematically more chemically "depleted" — lower in incompatible trace elements — than basalt erupted at ocean island hotspots like Hawaii (OIB, also Section 3.6). This is interpreted as evidence that the shallow, MORB-source mantle has already had much of its incompatible-element content extracted into the crust over Earth's history (Section 3.9), while OIB-source material sampled by deep mantle plumes (Section 6.2) is less depleted, either because it comes from deeper, less-processed mantle or because it includes recycled material with a different history. - **Named mantle ****"****end-members****"****:** geochemists use isotopic ratios (strontium, neodymium, lead, and noble gases) to identify several recurring, named chemical signatures found in OIB samples worldwide — including "HIMU" (high time-integrated uranium/lead ratio, thought to reflect recycled ancient oceanic crust) and two "enriched mantle" signatures termed EM1 and EM2 (thought to reflect recycled sediment or ancient subducted continental material). No single mixture of these signatures matches any other, suggesting the deep mantle retains multiple, geographically and chemically distinct source regions rather than a single well-stirred reservoir. - **Connection to the LLSVPs and primordial layer:** the unusually undegassed noble-gas signatures discussed in Section 11.3 as evidence for a possible ancient, unmixed deep mantle reservoir are part of this same broader picture — the mantle's chemical heterogeneity operates at multiple scales, from the broad LLSVP structures visible in seismic tomography down to the isotopic fingerprints carried in individual erupted lavas. ## 4.6 Water in the Mantle: The Transition Zone as a Hidden Reservoir Mantle minerals are not literally dry, even though they contain no liquid water in any conventional sense — and the amount of water they can hold has real implications for planetary-scale water budgets. - **Nominally anhydrous minerals:** minerals like olivine, wadsleyite, and ringwoodite (Section 4.3) can incorporate small amounts of water as hydroxyl (OH) defects within their crystal structure, even though they are not classified as "hydrous" minerals — wadsleyite and ringwoodite, the dominant minerals of the transition zone between 410 and 660 km, have the highest water-storage capacity of any common mantle mineral, potentially holding up to 1–3% water by weight under laboratory conditions. - **Direct evidence:** in 2014, a diamond brought to the surface by a volcanic eruption in Brazil was found to contain a tiny inclusion of ringwoodite that had trapped roughly 1.5% water by weight — direct physical proof that at least some portions of the transition zone genuinely do hold water near their theoretical maximum capacity, rather than that capacity being a purely theoretical upper bound. - **Planetary-scale implication:** if even a modest fraction of the transition zone worldwide holds water anywhere near this concentration, the mantle transition zone alone could store an amount of water comparable to, or exceeding, the volume of Earth's surface oceans — reframing the deep water cycle introduced in Section 10.3 not just as a slow exchange process, but as evidence of a potentially enormous, largely invisible reservoir. ## 4.7 Direct Sampling: Mantle Xenoliths Section 8's opening line noted that direct sampling of the deep interior is impossible — but that statement has one narrow, genuine exception relevant specifically to the shallow mantle. - **What xenoliths are:** certain volcanic eruptions, especially fast, deep-sourced eruptions through narrow volcanic pipes called kimberlites, rip off and carry chunks of surrounding mantle rock to the surface largely intact, rather than melting them along the way. These fragments, called xenoliths ("foreign rocks"), are genuine, unaltered samples of mantle material, typically originating from depths of 150–200 km. - **Why this matters:** xenoliths provide direct ground-truth for the pyrolite composition model (Section 4.3), for mantle temperature estimates at the depth they came from (Section 4.8), and even for the ages of specific mantle regions — some xenoliths from beneath old continental cratons have been dated to over 3 billion years old, indicating some deep continental mantle "keels" have remained attached to their overlying crust for most of Earth's history rather than being continuously recycled through convection. - **The limit of this method:** xenoliths only sample the uppermost mantle reachable by kimberlite eruptions — nothing comparable exists for the transition zone, lower mantle, or CMB region, which is why essentially everything said about those deeper regions elsewhere in this document still relies on the indirect seismological, gravimetric, and experimental methods described in Sections 8 and 9.8, not on direct samples. ## 4.8 The Mantle's Temperature Structure: Geotherms and Potential Temperature The mantle's temperature does not simply increase steadily with depth the way it might in a purely conductive material — its thermal structure reflects the fact that most of the mantle is actively convecting. - **The convecting mantle follows an adiabat:** away from thermal boundary layers (the lithosphere at the top and the D″ layer at the base, Section 6.5), temperature in the vigorously convecting bulk of the mantle rises with depth mainly because of the adiabatic effect of increasing pressure on rising or sinking material, rather than because of heat conduction — the same physical principle (adiabatic compression) that warms air compressed in a bicycle pump. - **Potential temperature:** to compare the "true" thermal state of mantle material at different depths on equal footing, geophysicists use potential temperature — the temperature a parcel of mantle rock would have if brought adiabatically to the surface without melting. Estimates for the ambient upper mantle's potential temperature cluster around 1300–1400°C, while material sourced from mantle plumes (Section 6.2) is estimated to run 100–300°C hotter, which is part of the evidence used to argue that plumes are genuinely anomalously hot upwellings rather than just normal mantle flow that happens to reach the surface at an unusual location. - **Sharp gradients are concentrated at the boundaries:** almost all of the mantle's non-adiabatic temperature change is concentrated in thin thermal boundary layers — across the base of the lithosphere (Section 3.3) and across the D″ layer just above the CMB (Section 6.5) — rather than being spread evenly through the mantle's bulk, consistent with the boundary-layer convection picture introduced in Section 10.2.

Key CharacteristicsMajor Functions and Features
•
•
•
• 		•
•
•
Header Header
Data 1 Data 2

Back